Model of Sustainable Tax Development Practices under Information Environment by Total Interpretive/Structural Model (TISM)

Document Type : Original Article


1 PhD Candidate, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran.

2 Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran.

3 Assistante Prof., Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran.


The dynamics of corporate information environments are seen as a basis for managerial decision-making such as sustainable tax development, which can reduce agency costs and promote market-level information symmetry across regulatory bodies. The purpose of this research is presenting a Model of Sustainable Tax Development Functions under the Information Environment of Tehran Stock Exchange Companies. In this research-based on qualitative and quantitative methodology, Initially, 13 tax professionals who were also active at the university level, Participated in the Meta-synthesis and the Delphi section to validate the research components and indicators among the 11 approved studies, Delphi analysis used to identify the theoretical adequacy of the component and the set of indices. In the quantitative section, 28 CEO of the stock exchange companies who were selected through an available sampling method selected randomly and used matrix questionnaires to stratify the identified indices in a range of the most influential indices. To the least effective indicators. The results in qualitative Analysis indicate the existence of three main components in the form of the final indicators based on theoretical adequacy and in the quantitative section, it was found that the indicators, greater dynamics of the value of the company based on tax transparency (C1) as an indicator of external information environment functions and increased The level of disclosure of economic performance in line with the GRI standard (C9) and the strategic balance between tax minimization and corporate value (C10) as an indicator of the component of internal information environment functions most strongly as a consequence of sustainable tax development under corporate information environment conditions for stock companies. Tehran Stock Exchange. These results show that the development of sustainable tax functions under corporate information environment conditions can also help to improve the effectiveness of corporate internal operations, regardless of the positive effects on the competitive and market levels.


Abernathy, J, A., Kubick, Th, R., Masli, A. (2016). General Counsel Prominence and Corporate Tax Policy. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 38(1): 39-56.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.
Beck, P. J., Davis, J. S., Jung, W, O., (1996). Tax advice and reporting under uncertainty: theory and experimental evidence, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1): 49–80.
Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3): 296–343.
Chen, C, W., Hepfer, B, F., Quinn, Ph, J., Wilson, R, J. (2018). The effect of tax-motivated income shifting on information asymmetry, Review of Accounting Studies, 23(3): 958-100.
David, A., Wilson, R, J., Kaishu, W. (2019) Tax Uncertainty and Incremental Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review, 94(2): 229-247.
Deloitte, L, L, P. (2013). Responsible Tax: Sustainable Tax Strategy.
Desai, M., Dharmapala, D. (2009). Earnings Management, Corporate Tax Shelters, and Book-Tax Alignment, National Tax Journal, 62(1): 213-239.
Diaz-Balteiro, Gonzalez-Pachon, J., Romero, C. (2017). Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review, European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2): 607-616.
Dyreng, S, D., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E, L. (2019). When Does Tax Avoidance Result in Tax Uncertainty? The Accounting Review, 94(2): 179-203.
Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. (2014). Rolling the Dice: When does Tax Avoidance Result in Tax Uncertainty? Working paper, Duke University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and The University of North Carolina.
Fakhari H, Rezaei Pitenoei Y. Explaining a Model for Measuring Corporate Information Environment. quarterly financial accounting journal. 2017; 9 (33) :121-147
Gallemore, J., Labro, E. (2015). The importance of the internal information environment for tax avoidance, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1): 149-167.
Guenther, D, A., Matsunaga, S, R., Williams, B, M. (2017). Is Tax Avoidance Related to Firm Risk?. The Accounting Review, 92(1):115-136.
Hamilton, R., Stekelberg, J. (2017). The Effect of High-Quality Information Technology on Corporate Tax Avoidance and Tax Risk, Journal of Information Systems, 31(2): 83-106.
Healy, P. and Palepu, K. G., (1993). The Effect of Firms’ Financial Disclosure Policies on Stock Prices, Accounting Horizons, 7(3): 1−11.
Heidarzadeh Hanzaei, A., Barati, L. (2019). Information Environment and Earnings Management in Companies to Dual Holdings. Journal of Investment Knowledge, 8(29), 215-332.
Hoffman, W. H. (1961). The theory of tax planning. The Accounting Review, 36(2): 274–281
Hogsden J. (2018). The Contemporary Corporate Tax Strategy Environment, Contemporary Issues in Accounting, 22(4): 85-104.
Hutchens, M., Rego, S, O. (2015). Tax Risk and the Cost of Equity Capital. Working paper, Indiana University.
Kaffashpour Yazdi, M., Taftiyan, A., Moeinaddin, M. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Information Environment on the Relationship between Management Forecast Error and Idiosyncratic Risk in Companies Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange. Management Accounting, 12(41), 151-169.
Leece, R. D., White, T, P. (2017). The effects of firms’ information environment on analysts’ herding behavior, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 48(2): 503-525.
Malaquias, R., Junior, D. (2019). Strategy, tax planning and liquidity constraints in investment funds, Journal of Economic Studies, 46(4):842-857.
McGuire, S., Neuman, S., Omer, T. (2013). Sustainable Tax Strategies and Earnings Persistence. Working paper, Texas A&M University and the University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
Mgammal, M. (2019). Corporate tax planning and corporate tax disclosure, Meditari Accountancy Research,
Papadopoulou P., Hristu-Varsakelis D. (2019). Tax Evasion as an Optimal Solution to a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process. Approximation and Optimization, 145(11): 219-237.
Phillips, J.D (2003). Corporate Tax-planning Effectiveness: the Role of Compensation based Incentives, The Accounting Review, 78(3): 847-874.
Ppourhaidari, O., Shafiei Hemmatabad, H. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Tax Rate Change for Earnings Management: The Case Study Reform Taxation Act in 1380. Applied Research in Financial Reporting, 2(1), 25-44.
Sadeghi, S., Ranjpor, R., Bagherzadeh Azar, F., Mousavi, S. (2016). The Effects of Tax Policies on Financial Markets Development. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 20(65), 37-61.
Sari M, Etemadi H, Sepasi S. The Importance of the Internal Information Environment Quality for Tax Risk Reduction. IQBQ. 2019; 23 (2) :1-27
Shanthi, R., Tong, P, K. (2017). The Persistent Reduction in Poverty from Filing a Tax Return, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(4):367-94.
Tanyi, P., Burton, H. (2019). Financial Statement Aggressiveness Related to Tax Accounts and Tax-Related Accounting Misstatements, Accounting and the Public,
Wang, T. (2019). Product market competition and efficiency of corporate tax management, Asian Review of Accounting, 27(2): 247-272.
Wilde, J, H., Wilson, R, J. (2018). Perspectives on Corporate Tax Planning: Observations from the Past Decade. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(2): 63-81.