Auditors’ Wise Tactfulness in Professional Judgments by Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Accounting, Shahroud Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahroud, Iran.

2 Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Shahroud Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahroud, Iran.

3 Assistant Prof., Department of Accounting, Shahroud Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahroud, Iran.

Abstract

Since the auditing profession is a process engaged in judgment activities, knowing the reasoning concepts to achieve a level of rationale in audit judgment is the theoretical and fundamental concept in this profession. In this regard, tactfulness is one of the decision-making components in an auditor's judgment that assigns a level of reasoning for making an intellectual decision and promotes the level of judgment quality in auditing. Accordingly, the purpose of this research is Auditors’ Wise Tactfulness in Professional Judgments by Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM). The mixed-methods approach was used for the research in which, in the qualitative part, two experts population as panel members, and, in the quantitative part, 30 independent auditors as the statistical population participated. In the qualitative part, the meta-analysis approach was used to identify the themes related to wise tactfulness in professional judgment, and then, the basic themes selected were examined based on two criteria, concordance coefficient and average, in three rounds reciprocally until theoretical saturation was met. At this point, 14 themes were accepted among 20 basic themes. In the quantitative part, the themes accepted were coded first and then were distributed among the respective population, based on a matrix questionnaire, to identify the most effective trait of auditor's wise tactfulness in professional judgment using the Total Interpretive Structural Modeling approach. According to the results, the theme adherence to the principles of professional ethics as a basic theme of professional thinking was selected as the most influential trait of wise tactfulness.

Keywords


Andrel, J, A., Keith, S, W., Leiby, B, E. (2009). Meta‐analysis: A Brief Introduction, Clinical and Translational Science, 2(5): 374-378.
Attri, r., Dev, n., & Sharma, v. (2013). Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: An Overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 6.
Azkia M., Tavakkoli, M. (2016). Meta-analysis of researches on job satisfaction in educational organizations, Journal of Social sciences Letters, 27 (2), 1-26. (In Persian).
Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (1990). Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 87–120.
Bergsma, A., & Ardelt, M. (2012). Self-reported wisdom and happiness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 481–499
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K. (1990). The psychology of wisdom: An evolutionary interpretation, In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development, Cambridge: New York: 25-51
Dunn, J. (2005). Auditing Theory and Practice, Prentice-Hall Direct; Subsequent Second Edition.
Ejabi, E., Ghazi, H., Malekmohammadi, H. (2012). Decision-taking and decision-making through simulation models, Journal of military science and tactics, 8(22), 51-66.
Elangovan, A, R., Suddaby, R. (2018). Solomons for our times: Wisdom in decision-making in organizations, Organizational Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2019.03.001
Javidi K, Royaei R, Talebnia G, Banimahd B. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Construal Mindset Orientation on Auditors’ Judgment and Decision Making: Based on Construal level Theory of Psychological Distance. Quarterly financial accounting journal, 10 (39): 141-169. (In Persian).
Kadous, K., Zhou, Y. (2018). How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?, Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1): 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12431
Lam, K, C, K., Mensah, M. (2016). Auditors’ decision-making undergoing-concern uncertainties in low litigation-risk environments: Evidence from Hong Kong, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25; 706–739.
Lenz, H. (2008). The Rational Auditor and Moral Norms: The Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants – Lip Service or Self-Binding Agreement? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2717507
Lynch, A, L., Murthy, U, S., Engle, T, J. (2009) Fraud brainstorming using computer-mediated communication: The effects of brainstorming technique and facilitation. Accounting Review 84(4): 1209–1232.
Malone, D. W. (2014). An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(3), 397-404.
Mashayekhifard S, Pourzamani Z, Jahanshad A. (2019). The Mediating Role of the Auditor’s Philosophic-Mindedness on Effects of Social Trust and Social Identity on Professional Judgment, Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 4 (7), 23-62. (In Persian).
Melé, D. (2010). Practical wisdom in managerial decision making, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 29 Issue: 7/8, pp.637-645, https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711011059068
Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. (2015). Validity and Reliability of the Instruments and Types of Measurements in Health Applied Researches. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 13 (12), 1153-1170. (In Persian).
Paranoan, N., Roreng, P, P., Tandirerung, C, J., Tandungan, E, S. (2018). Disclosing Professionalism Behaviour of Internal Auditor in Preventing Fraud by Using the Local Cultural Wisdom ‘Longko’ (A Case Study at Toraja Tribe, South Sulawesi, Indonesia), The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation, DOI 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3462
Radcliffe, V, S. (1998). Efficiency audit: An assembly of rationalities and programmes, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(4): 377-410
Ramesh, A., Banwet, D.K., Shankar, R. (2010). “Modeling the Barriers of Supply Chain Collaboration”, Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(2): 176–193.
Richardson, M. J., & Pasupathi, M. (2005). Young and growing wiser: Wisdom during adolescence and young adulthood. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. Jordan (Eds.), A handbook of wisdom. Psycho-logical perspectives. New York: Cambridge University, 139–159
Rooney, D. (2013). Being a wise organizational researcher: Ontology, epistemology and axiology. In W. M. K¨upers, & D. J. Pauleen (Eds.), A handbook of practical wisdom: Leadership, organization and integral business practice. Aldershot: Gower, 79–98
Sadeghi-Fasaei, S., Naser-Rad, M. (2012). Fundamental Elements of Qualitative Research in Social Sciences (Ontology, Epistemology, Methodology and Methods), Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 5(2), 78-98. (In Persian).
Sandelowski, M., Barros, J. (2008). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research, Springer publishing company Inc.
Schraagen, J. M., Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. R. (2008). The macrocognition framework of naturalistic decision making. In J. M. Schraagen, L. G. Militello, T. Ormerod, & R. Lipshitz (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making and macrocognition. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 3–25.
Singh, M. D., & Kant, R. (2011). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(2), 10.
Small, M. W. (2004). Wisdom and nowmanagerial wisdom: Do they have a place in management development programs? Journal of Management Development, 23(8), 751–764.
Soleimani H., Bashash, L. (2013). Validation of the Revised Family Needs Survey (R-FNS) Scale for Families with Children with Special Needs, 14(4), 106-120. (In Persian).
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). What is wisdom and how can we develop it? Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(12): 164-74.
Stirling, J., (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research, Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Sweeney, C., Bernardi, R. and Arnold, D. (2014). Could the Level of Personal Indebtedness Influence an Auditor’s Professional Decision-Making Process?, Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting (Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting), 18(2): 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1574-076520140000018003
Valentine, S., Godkin, L. (2019). Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention, Journal of Business Research, 98(4): 277-288
Valiyan H, Abdoli M R, Karimi S. (2018). Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) of Factors Affecting Auditor’s Professional Skepticism, Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2 (4), 215-246
Valiyan, H., Abdoli, M., Koushki Jahromi A., (2019). Conceptualizing Wise Auditor Decision-Making based on Grounded Theory Approach, Accounting and Auditing Review, 26(2), 301-326 https://doi.org/10.22059/acctgrev.2019.265838.1007989
Windhorst, H. D. (2011). Loving wisdom with Dewey and Simone Weil. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 31(1), 41–55.
Yang, L., Brink, A, G., Wier, B. (2018). The impact of emotional intelligence on auditor judgment, International Journal of Auditing, 22(1): 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12106
Zsambok, C. E. (1997). Naturalistic decision making: Where are we now? In C. E. Zsambok, & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 3–16.