Amin Sadat; Ebrahim Abbasi; Hasan Ghalibaf Asl
Abstract
Stock return predictability has been extensively considered as a stylized reality. Theories indicate that returns should change along the time, and various studies have presented evidence on this point. On the other hand, there is an optimal portfolio in each regime, and one cannot claim that a specific ...
Read More
Stock return predictability has been extensively considered as a stylized reality. Theories indicate that returns should change along the time, and various studies have presented evidence on this point. On the other hand, there is an optimal portfolio in each regime, and one cannot claim that a specific portfolio can minimize risk and returns in each regime. On the other hand, the financial conditions index (FCI) is an important index to specify monetary policy conditions. Regarding the importance of the issue, this research aims to present a comprehensive index, including all monetary transmission mechanisms. In this regard, it is attempted to improve the efficiency of stock return predictability in Iran's economy by incorporating an FCI and identifying relationships between FCI and stock returns using the TVP-DMA model, which can resolve shortcomings of traditional models. The study is applied research in terms of purpose. Seasonal data over the period of April 1991 to July 2019 is used. The results based on TPV, DMS, and DMA models indicate that liquidity growth rate, economic growth rate, unemployment rate, exchange rate, financial condition index, oil revenues, misery index, and budget deficit, has significantly affected factors of stock returns in 30, 50, 11, 49, 66, 54, 7, and 84 periods of 104 periods, respectively. Accordingly, budget deficit, financial condition index, oil revenues, and economic growth are the most effective factors of stock returns predictability in Iran. Further, the incorporation of flexibility in coefficients of the financial development index leads to higher forecast accuracy.
Mohammad Nasiri; Nouroz Nourollahzadeh; Fatemeh Sarraf; Mohsen Hamidian
Abstract
Behavioral finance is a new issue raised by some financial intellectuals over the past two decades and has been quickly addressed by professors, experts, and students throughout the world. Investigating the factors affecting investment decisions is carried out in the field of behavioral finance; in other ...
Read More
Behavioral finance is a new issue raised by some financial intellectuals over the past two decades and has been quickly addressed by professors, experts, and students throughout the world. Investigating the factors affecting investment decisions is carried out in the field of behavioral finance; in other words, the focus of behavioral finance is on the specific charac-teristics of human behavior and applying them in asset pricing. Empirically, pricing models rarely include psychological factors, but the noticeable point is that nowadays, researchers have found behavioral factors influencing empirical asset pricing models that can manipulate returns on asset mispricing. Behavioral asset pricing is the result of applying behavioral finance theories within traditional asset pricing theories. Thus, despite the existence of many asset pricing models, due to their weaknesses and lack of comprehensiveness, as well as the necessity of reviewing behavioral factors, this study aims to model asset pricing through behavioral models. Using the data from 141 listed firms in Tehran Stock Exchange over the years 2008 to 2017 and multivariate regression, this study is an attempts to model asset pric-ing through employing behavioral models and Fama-French approach. Using Fama-French approach, the results showed that accounting information risk, investors’ trading behavior, and investors' sentiment have a direct and significant impact on asset pricing.
Mohammad Reza Rostami; Peyman Alipour; Adel Behzadi
Abstract
Identifying the causal relations between trading volume and stock returns and between trading volume and return volatility plays a vital role in identifying profitable investment opportunities. In this study, the Granger causality test was conducted to analyze the causal relationships between the mentioned ...
Read More
Identifying the causal relations between trading volume and stock returns and between trading volume and return volatility plays a vital role in identifying profitable investment opportunities. In this study, the Granger causality test was conducted to analyze the causal relationships between the mentioned variables in Tehran Stock Exchange. Consequently, the Vector Auto Regression (VAR) model was employed to determine the conditional mean equations of returns and volume. Moreover, the bivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model was used to model the conditional variance equation, stating the relationship between volume and return volatility. According to the results, no bilateral causal relationship can be ascertained between returns, volume, and return volatility. In other words, return and return volatility could barely predict volume; therefore, volume cannot be the Granger causality of the other two variables. However, stock returns were found to have an important role in determining the volume. Likewise, return volatility can be used to predict volume accurately. In fact, stock returns and the return volatility were both the Granger causalities of the volume.