Modeling the effect of environmental corporate governance rating in the pricing information asymmetry

Document Type : Original Article


1 Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Allameh Tabataba ُi University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Allameh Tabataba ُi University, Tehran, Iran.


Information flow is a key parameter in an economic activity that acts as the main factor in the capital market emergence, stability, and efficiency. The purpose of the current research is to investigate the effect of the environmental points of cooperate governance on the pricing of information asymmetry. In this regard, we have extracted data related to companies accepted in the "Tehran Stock Exchange" from 2009 to 2018, and a panel-data regression model was utilized to test research hypnosis. The results show that information asymmetry and environmental points of cooperate governance have a significant effect on the expected return (cost of capital) on an investment. In addition, the effect of environmental points of cooperate governance on the relationship between the information asymmetry and the cost of capital has been verified. Finally, the results show that environmental points of cooperate governance leads to the differences in the cost of capital in the different levels of information asymmetry.


Akins, B., Ng, J and Verdi, R. (2012); “Investor competition over information and the pricing of information asymmetry”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 87 No. 1, pp.35–58.
Atias C., J. Core, D. (1987). When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital? Journal of Accounting Research 49 (1): 1-40.
Berowan, C., and M. Hili'ist, (2007), A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital, Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 21–40.
Ben, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2020). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021.
Chang, E., Lin, T., Ma, X., (2014). Governance through trading and corporate investment decisions. Working paper, University of Hong Kong.
Chen, C., Xiumin M., Roychowdhury, S., Xin W., and Matthew, B. (2016). Clarity Begins at Home: Internal Information Asymmetry and External Communication Quality. Forthcoming the Accounting Review.
Chen, J.-H., Choi, and Liang, D. (2017). Financial Statement Comparability and the Ability of Current Stock Returns to Reflect the Information in Future Earnings, available at 2337571.
Derabitez, G., Kothari, S., Verdi, R. (2016). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49 (4), 895–931.
Diata, D., and R. Verrecchia. (2018). Disclosure, liquidity and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance 46 (4): 1325-1359.
Derato, P. J & Kim, J. (2010). Who's informed? An analysis of stockownership and informed trading. An Analysis of Stock Ownership andInformed Trading (June 4), AFA
Dou, Y., Hope, O., Thomas, W., Zou, Y., (2015). Blockholder exit threats and financial reporting quality. Working paper, University of Toronto.
Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance 59 (4):1553-1583.
Fishman, M., and Hagerty, K. (1987) Insider trading and the efficiency of stock prices, RAND Journal of Economics 23, 106-122.
Ferancis, R., Kraft, A. and Zhang, H. (2005). Financial reporting frequency, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(2-3), 132-149.
Golep, A., G. and L. Zarowin, (2002), SEC Regulation Fair Disclosure, Information, and the Cost of Capital, Working Paper: Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; Case Western Reserve University.
Guopta, H., & Sharma, B. (2018). A Better Measure of Institutional Informed Trading. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 815–850.Joenz, M. C. (2005). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
Johnston, J. A and Sow, C. (2019). Accruals quality and price synchronicity. University of Louisiana state & SSRN.
Kyle, A. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trade. Econometrica 53, 1315–1335.
Kamono, S. & Wefimis, S. A. (2005). "How Disclosure Quality Affects the Level of Information Asymmetry". Review of Accounting Studies. 12: 443–477.
Kaiy L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2019). Does the contribution of corporate cash holdings and dividends to firm value depend on governance? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2725–2751.
Kormiter .M. Venkatesh, P., & Chiang, R. (2010). Information Asymmetry and the Dealer TM s Bid-Ask Spread: A Case Study of Earnings and Dividend Announcements. Journal of Finance, 41(5), 1089–1102.
Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. Verrecchia. (2012). Information asymmetry, information precision, and the cost of capital. Review of Finance (forthcoming).
Landehem, M. and Mirez .V.(2002). The relationship among information asymmetry, dividend policy and ownership structure. Finance Research Letters 20.
Luriy, R. and L. Myers (2005). "Bringing the future forward: The effect of disclosure on the returns earnings relation". Journal of Accounting Research 40(3): pp 809.
Merton, R., (1987), A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information, Journal of Finance 43, 483-510.
Minik and, D., Toga, M. (2010). Option volume and stock prices: Evidence on where informed traders trade. The Journal of Finance, 53 (2), 431-465.
Nagar, Z., Musa, H. & Debnarova, L (2018). The impact of governance on information asymmetry in Slovakia. Dol:10.18844/gjhss.V3i4.1511.
Owen .A. L. Benjamin, and J.S. Jen. (2010). Corporate governance andstock liquidity dimensions: Panel evidence from the pure order-driven Australian market. International Review of Economics and Finance 50: 275-304
Ebrahimi, E., Mehrani, K., Nazari, M. (2020). Competitiveness and Pricing of Accounting Information Asymmetry and Quality. Empirical Research in Accounting, 9(3), 179-202. doi: 10.22051/jera.2019.21292.2110
Vakilian Aghouie, M., Abbaszadeh, M., Salehi, M. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Audit Return and Audit Quality in the Pharmacological Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Health Accounting, 5(1), 107-133
Rashidi baghi M, Khodadadi V, Ramzan Ahmadi M, Farazmand H. (2019) Modeling the Interactive Effect of Disclosure Quality on Information Asymmetry Pricing. Quarterly financial accounting journal; 11(41):103-125
Rahimian, N., Salehnejad, S., Saleki, A. (2010). Relationship between the Some of Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Information Asymmetry in the Firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Review, 16(4).
Emamgholipour, M., Yadollahzadeh Tabari, N. (2014). The Effect of Corporate Governance and Audit Quality on the Weighted Average Cost of Capital: Comparative Analysis Based on Auditor Size, Firm Size and Income Smoother and non-Smoother Companies. Asset Management and Financing, 2(3), 29-48.
Baghani, A., Ahmadi, N., Setak, H. (2018). The Relationship between Corporate Governance and Information Asymmetry with Stock Returns in Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange, 9(18), 57-71.
Joudi, S., Mansourfar, G., Didar, H. (2019). Internal and External Corporate Governance Quality, Information Asymmetry and Cash Holdings: Increase or Decrease in the Firm Value? Accounting and Auditing Review, 26(1), 39-64
Joudi, S., Mansourfar (PhD), G. (2019). Information Asymmetry, Internal and External Dimensions of Corporate Governance Quality: Improving or Worsening Audit Quality, 10(3), 199-231. doi: 10.22103/jak.2019.12497.2751
Sharder, E. (2020). Corporate Governance and Product Market Competition. Working Paper, Madras School of Economics, India.
Solomon, B. C. (2010). The effect of accounting comparability on the accrual-based and real earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 513–539.
Scott E. Seavey, and David B. Smith (2009) Comparability and Cost of Equity Capital. Accounting Horizons: June 2017, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 125-138.
Wang, J.and Ki,m, (2007). A model of intertemporal asset prices under asymmetric information. The Review of Economic Studies, 60 (2), 249-28