Document Type : Original Article
1 Faculty Member of Al-Zahra University
2 PHD in Economics,
Increased government revenues and improved economic efficiency are the main goals of implementing privatization and regime switch in Iran. Information efficiency in the capital market can also be considered as a milestone for increased government revenues and improved economic efficiency. In this study, according to the results of regime switching GARCH models, it is determined that stock returns have had different regimes during the study period (2000-2015). According to the results of the estimation of the three-regime GARCH model, the most important events of the Article 44 of the Constitution in the direction of privatization in Iran's economy and its implementation during the study period have been effective in switching the regimes of the fluctuating process of efficiency. Market risk has also been identified as a factor affecting regime switching in the stock return process, which is due to the behavior of stockholders in low-fluctuation regimes compared to high-fluctuation regimes and liquidity. Also, according to the Kalman filter model, poor performance has been established in Tehran Stock Exchange, which indicates that privatization policy has been effective in improving the efficiency of this marketplace. Using the technique related to the detection of structural failure in the liquidity variable as one of the signs of the stock market depth, the failure of this series was detected by virtue of the implementation of privatization, and it was discovered that privatization increased market liquidity as one of the principles of market development.
models and Markov Regime-Switching GARCH", Financial Knowledge of Securites
2. Dadgar, Y. (2013). Public Sector Economics, Mofid University.
3. Saeedi, A. &Babaluian, SH. (2012). "Financial and operating performance of companies in
the Tehran Stock Exchange under Article 44 provided before and after the privatization",
journal of Iran's Economic Essays", No.18, pp:9-28.
4. Shams, SH. Babaluian, SH, &Jola, J. (2010). "Study of Portfolio Efficiency Article 44 firms
offered at Tehran Stock Exchange", Quarterly Stock Exchange Market, N.10, PP:77-90.
5. Abasian, E. &Zolfaghari, M. (2013)," Dynamic analysis of the weak form efficiency by the
Kalman filter in Tehran Stock Exchange",Quarterly journal of Economic Research and
Policies", No.65, pp:231-254.
6. Mirzade, A &Shahbazi, M &JavaheriKamel, M.(2009), "Take the philosophy and global
trends OF privizitation", Tadbir journal, No 209.
7. Arouri, M. & Nguyen, D. &Dnh, T. (2010), "Time-Varying in Crude Oil Markets: The Case
of GCC Countries", HAL archives quvertes.
8. Engle, R. (1982), "Autoregressive ConditonalHeteroscedasticity with Estimates of Variance
of United Kingdom Inflation", Econometrica 50, pp:987-1008.
9. Fama,E.F.(1970),"Efficient Capital Market:A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”, the
Journalof Finance, No2, pp.283-417.
10.Hamilton, J. (1994), "Time Series Analysis", Pinceton University Press, Business &
Economics, 799 pages.
11.Hamilton, J. (1989), "A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time
Series and the Business Cycle", Econometrica 52(2), pp: 357-384.
12.Klaassen, F. (2002). "Improving GARCH Volatility Forecasts with Rejime- Switching
GARCH", Emprical Economics 27(2), pp: 363-394.
13.MayBeck, P. (1979). "Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control", Academic Press, LNC,
111 fifth Avenue, NewYork.
14.Morrison, G. & Pike, D.(1977). "Kalman Filtering Applied to Statistical Forecasting",
Management Science, V.23, N.7.
15.Rejeb, A. &Boughrara, A. (2013), "Financial Liberalization and Stock Markets Efficiency
New Evidence from Emergying Economies", Emerging Market Review, 186-208.