Document Type : Original Article


1 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch

2 Office of Training and Education Center, Securities and Exchange Organization, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD Student; Financial Management, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch


The study is to review the disclosure quality rank on income-smoothing and informativeness by means of four hypotheses. The timescale is between 2010 and 2016, and 149 TSE’s listed companies are studied. The first hypothesis examines the effect of higher disclosure quality rank on income informativeness. The result confirms that higher rank of disclosure quality improves income informativeness. The second hypothesis reviews the relationship between disclosure quality rank and income smoothing. The findings of this hypothesis indicate lower disclosure quality will increase income smoothing behavior. In the third hypothesis, the effect of income smoothing on informativeness is examined, which results in a statistical view that income smoothing has a sensible positive effect on informativeness. Finally, the effect of higher rank of disclosure quality on the informativeness of the smoothing listed companies in the fourth hypothesis. The findings indicate that income smoothing has a meaningful effect in strong disclosure quality companies.


Abramova, Inna and Core, John E. and Sutherland, Andrew, Institutional
Investor Attention and Firm Disclosure (August 23, 2018). 29th Annual
Conference on Financial Economics & Accounting 2018.
Aczel, A.D. 2002. Complete Business Statistics, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill,
New York, N.Y.
Albrecht, W. D. and Richardson, F. M., “Income Smoothing by Economy
Sector,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(5), Winter 1990, pp.713-
Bao, B-H., and Bao, D-H., “Income Smoothing, Earnings Quality and Firm
Valuation,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31(9) & (10), November /
December 2004, pp. 1525-1557.
Barnea, A., Ronen, J., and Sadan, S., “Classificatory Smoothing of Income with
Extraordinary Items,” The Accounting Review, 51(1), January 1976, pp. 110-122.
Barth, M.E., Cram, D.P., and Nelson, K.K., “Accruals and the Prediction of
Future Cash Flows,” The Accounting Review, 76(1), January 2001, pp. 27-58.
Belsky, J., Hsieh, K., & Crnic, K. (1998). Mothering, fathering, and infant
negativity as antecedents of boys’ externalizing problems and inhibition at age 3:
Differential susceptibility to rearing influence? Development and Psychopathology,
10, 301-319.
Bens, D., Nagar, V., and Wong, M.H.F., “Real Investment Implications of
Employee Stock Option Exercises,” Journal of Accounting Research, 40(2), 2002,
pp. 359-393.
Carlson, S. J. and Bathala, C. T., “Ownership Differences and Firms’ Income
Smoothing Behavior,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(2), March
1997, pp.179.-196.
Chen, Qi and Corona, Carlos and Zhang, Yun, Investor Attention and
Disclosure Effectiveness (December 1, 2018). Available at SSRN:
Cheng, Hua and Huang, Dayong and Luo, Yan, Corporate Disclosure Quality and
Institutional Investors' Holdings During Market Downturns (August 1, 2018).
Available at SSRN:
Dechow, P.M. and Dichev, I.D., “The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The
Role of Accrual Estimation Errors,” The Accounting Review, Supplement 77(4),
2002, pp. 35-59.
Faello, J.p. 2012. “Is strong corporate governance associated with informative
income smoothing”, PhD Dissertation, Mississippi State University. 
156 Iranian Journal of Finance
Francis J, Khurana I, Pereira R. Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of
capital around the world. The Accounting Review 2005; 80:1125-1163.
Goel, A. M., and Thakor, A.V., “Why Do Firms Smooth Earnings?”, The
Journal of Business, 76(1), January 2003, pp. 151-192. 128
Kim, M. and Kross, W., “The Ability of Earnings to Predict Future Operating
Cash Flows Has Been Increasing – Not Decreasing,” Journal of Accounting
Research, 43(5), December 2005, pp. 753-780.
Kordestani, Gh. and Hosseini, N. Disclosure Quality and Information Content
of Earnings, winter, 2009, 1(1).
Lang M, Lundholm R. Disclosure quality and analyst behavior. The Accounting
Review 1996; 71:467-492.
Luez, C., N. Dhananjay, and P. D. Wysocki. 2002. Earnings Management and
Investor Protection: An International Comparison. Forthcoming Journal of
Financial Economics
Murphy, K., “Performance Standards in Incentive Contracts,” Journal of
Accounting and Economics, 30(3), December 2000, pp. 245-278.
Noravesh, I. and Hosseini, S. Corporate Disclosure Quality (consist of
timeliness and reliability) and Earnings Management, 2009, 16 (2).
Ronen, J. and Sadan, S. 1981. Smoothing Income Numbers: Objectives, Means
and Implications, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., Reading, MA.
Sadidi, M. Saghafi, A. and Ahmadi, S. Accounting Conservatism and the
Effects of Earning Quality on the Return of Assets and Stock Return, 2011, 2 (6),
Strauss, Diane and Chlapaty, Alli, The State of Corporate Disclosure on Wellbeing: A Review of Corporate Reporting Practices in the Food and Agriculture
Sector in 2018 (April 30, 2018). Presented at the 6th OECD World Forum on
Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, Incheon, Korea, 27-29 November 2018.
Tucker, J.W., and Zarowin, P.A., “Does Income Smoothing Improve Earnings
Informativeness?”, The Accounting Review, 81(1), January 2006, pp. 251-270.
Welker M. Disclosure policy, information asymmetry, and liquidity in equity
markets. contemporary Accounting Research 1995; spring: 801- 827.
Wruck, Karen H. and Wu, YiLin, Equity Incentives, Disclosure Quality, and Stock
Liquidity Risk (February 27, 2017). Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2017-
02; Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2017-03-002.